Claims that ancient Indian texts describe working aircraft, nuclear weapons or genetic engineering circulate endlessly. Because this site takes the texts seriously, it owes them the respect of an honest answer.
What the old texts actually contain
Flying chariots and aerial cities are real and abundant in the literature: the Rigveda's gods ride swift car-like vehicles; the Ramayana's Pushpaka vimana carries Rama home from Lanka through the sky; the Mahabharata gives King Shalva an aerial city, Saubha, that Krishna brings down. These are marvellous vehicles in sacred narrative — described by their effects (they fly, they shine, they go where thought goes), never by mechanism. No verse gives a wing loading. In that, they resemble the flying devices of every mythology, from Greek Daedalus to the Persian throne of Kay Kavus.
The "Vaimanika Shastra"
The document behind most "ancient aircraft blueprint" claims is the Vaimanika Shastra, and its provenance is not ancient: it was produced between 1918 and 1923 by Pandit Subbaraya Shastry of Anekal, who stated the content came to him in visions, with a Sanskrit text and drawings prepared in the early twentieth century. In 1974, five scientists at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore — Mukunda, Deshpande and colleagues — analysed its designs and published their finding: the crafts described are not feasible for flight, with geometries and propulsion that contradict basic aerodynamics. The paper is public and unrebutted.
Why the myth sells the texts short
The "ancient blueprints" claim asks the scriptures to be bad engineering manuals when they are extraordinary at what they actually are. The Gita's analysis of action and motive, the Yoga Sutras' map of attention, the Dhammapada's psychology of craving — these have survived every century's scrutiny because they describe the inner world with precision (test them yourself in the Study Hall). A tradition that genuinely anticipated something real — the disciplined observation of mind — does not need borrowed credit for aircraft.
The pattern to keep from this piece is the same one we apply to yuga end-dates: when a claim attaches modern specifics to an ancient text, check the date of the specifics. The verses are old; the blueprints never are.
Related
What the Bhagavata Purana really "predicts" · The Yoga Sutras · What prophecy is for